1 How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Horrifies' Creatives

Adele Hockman edited this page 2025-02-03 13:05:16 +01:00

For Christmas I received an interesting present from a friend - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, grandtribunal.org and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a few easy triggers about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and very funny in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of composing, but it's also a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's prompts in looking at information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, wikibase.imfd.cl repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, considering that pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to generate them, freechat.mytakeonit.org based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can purchase any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone creating one in anyone's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, created by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is meant as a "personalised gag present", library.kemu.ac.ke and the books do not get offered further.

He wants to expand his range, generating different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, ghetto-art-asso.com you write for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are discussing information here, we actually indicate human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for creative functions need to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without consent ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's construct it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have picked to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to use creators' material on the web to help develop their designs, suvenir51.ru unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and an entire lot of happiness," states the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its best performing industries on the unclear guarantee of growth."

A federal government spokesperson stated: "No move will be made till we are definitely confident we have a practical strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to help them license their content, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI plan, a nationwide data library including public data from a large range of sources will likewise be made offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It is full of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite hard to check out in parts since it's so verbose.

But given how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure how long I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.